We have heard a lot about how a few New
York residents fought off Amazon from building a new headquarters in
the city. There were a lot of arguments as to why they thought the
new headquarters was a bad deal for the city. There was one aspect I
thought was bad—The city was going to give Amazon $300 million in
grants. No city should give away money and assets to lure
corporations to the area, even if it would mean huge economical
gains for the area. The only exception might be if citizens voted for
the assistance, such as when they have referendum votes to build
sports stadiums.
Amazon was promised $3 billion in tax
breaks. It seems impossible to explain to leftists that a tax break
is letting someone keep their money, not giving them money. I wrote
in Reasoning
Behind Eliminating Business Taxes how a business doesn't pay any
taxes, because they pass those costs on to the consumer. For this
reason a tax break shouldn't matter. For some reason, democrats seem
to believe the city will lose $3 billion if Amazon comes.
We're told that one negative about
Amazon moving in was the type of jobs. It's said that all the jobs
would pay over $100,000. Those might be the primary jobs, but you can
be sure they will need janitors, building maintenance personnel, and
office assistants. Many of those will likely be contracted jobs.
Those workers would likely come from the surrounding area. Because
these jobs are often contracted out, a company might not count them
in the number of jobs their new location will supply.
Property taxes would likely rise if
someone like Amazon moves in, or if an area faces gentrification.
This is easily solved, you elect leaders who will reduce or eliminate
property taxes. Every apartment you rent, and every hamburger you
buy, has the costs of property taxes included in the price.
A Seattle resident was complaining
about Amazon. He said heavy traffic was a direct result of Amazon.
Someone in New York also complained that if Amazon came to the city,
the subways would be too crowded. Some leftists in Seattle go so far
as to call Amazon a monopoly, but so far I haven't determined what
kind. These are just excuses to avoid progress and/or just the deep
seeded hate for corporations that have been ingrained into democrats.
For a long time I've pondered the
reason people fight new, large, corporate businesses moving into
their area, and my conclusion was, it's because they resist change.
I've been told people were against Amazon because they feared rising
rent and property taxes. They were worried costs for everything would
rise. I admit, these are legitimize fears, but they are a part of
progress.
For decades we have heard of
Gentrification. In the beginning that was mostly about middle class
white people moving into poor, black neighborhoods. The term also
applies to any middle class person moving into a poor neighborhood,
no matter their race. Is gentrification bad? It surely is in the
beginning because as more and more higher earners move into the area,
prices will rise. Those price rises will have only a temporary affect
because, eventually, wages for most people will rise to equal things
out.
Gentrification
Gentrification is a process of renovating deteriorated urban neighborhoods by means of the influx of more affluent residents. This is a common and controversial topic in politics and in urban planning.
I have talked often about minimum
wage laws. When the minimum wage rises, many people are better
off for a short period. Studies show that within a year the price of
goods will rise until the people who got the raise are in the same
economic position as they were the year before. The same thing
happens with gentrification, although change is a lot slower, and
some people will likely never to rise to the new economic level.
Without doubt, some people will be forced to move to areas where rent
and food is cheaper. But most people will blend with the new
economical environment.
It's human nature to resit change.
Conservatives have always been seen as the group who fears change the
most. Conservative has become more of a label than a
description of people. When it comes to progressives, they seem to
have become the traditional conservatives who resisted change.
Progressives believe they can control the planet's environment so
that it never changes. Progressive conservatives will sit idly by as
communities degrade into poverty because they see change as bad. We
might say, progressives support social change while fearing economic
and environmental change.
A community will never rise out of
poverty unless there is change. Change is hard. Unless jobs move into
poor communities, nothing will ever change. Many people might not be
qualified for some of those new jobs, that's why, for decades, there
have been government and corporate training programs. Often, the
better paying jobs won't enter an area because of crime. Some like to
say it's poverty that creates criminals, but that's not true. Good
parenting is often the best tool for lowering crime. It's getting to
the point where police are afraid to enter minority areas with high
crime rates because their bosses fear being called racist. This is a
result of progressive democrats who are using race for political
gain.
City leaders aren't going to do
anything to help these communities. It's going to take people living
in these communities to remove the criminal element so that job
makers will move into the area. Teach people not to fear change, but
show them ways to make the change easier. Go to any neighborhood in
American and talk to the elderly, they will point out the changes
they have seen in their lives—some good and some bad, but as of
this writing, it's mostly for the better.
In my area the largest employer moved
out due to NAFTA. I watched former coworkers handle the change in a
variety of ways. Some became self-employed(me for one), while others
went back to school to learn a new trade. This was one of the
scariest times of my life, but it turned out to be the most
adventurous time of my life. Looking back, getting laid off was
surely one of the best things to ever happen in my life. If not for
the layoff, I doubt I would have ever completed four novels. When
economic change comes your way, go forward with confidence that you
can succeed. One thing is for sure, change is inevitably no matter
how much you resist. It takes a lot of effort for change not to
happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment